From 1abdfe706a579a702799fce465bceb9fb01d407c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex Belits Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 18:34:41 -0400 Subject: lib: Restrict cpumask_local_spread to houskeeping CPUs The current implementation of cpumask_local_spread() does not respect the isolated CPUs, i.e., even if a CPU has been isolated for Real-Time task, it will return it to the caller for pinning of its IRQ threads. Having these unwanted IRQ threads on an isolated CPU adds up to a latency overhead. Restrict the CPUs that are returned for spreading IRQs only to the available housekeeping CPUs. Signed-off-by: Alex Belits Signed-off-by: Nitesh Narayan Lal Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200625223443.2684-2-nitesh@redhat.com --- lib/cpumask.c | 16 +++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'lib/cpumask.c') diff --git a/lib/cpumask.c b/lib/cpumask.c index fb22fb266f93..85da6ab4fbb5 100644 --- a/lib/cpumask.c +++ b/lib/cpumask.c @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include /** * cpumask_next - get the next cpu in a cpumask @@ -205,22 +206,27 @@ void __init free_bootmem_cpumask_var(cpumask_var_t mask) */ unsigned int cpumask_local_spread(unsigned int i, int node) { - int cpu; + int cpu, hk_flags; + const struct cpumask *mask; + hk_flags = HK_FLAG_DOMAIN | HK_FLAG_MANAGED_IRQ; + mask = housekeeping_cpumask(hk_flags); /* Wrap: we always want a cpu. */ - i %= num_online_cpus(); + i %= cpumask_weight(mask); if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) { - for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask) + for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) { if (i-- == 0) return cpu; + } } else { /* NUMA first. */ - for_each_cpu_and(cpu, cpumask_of_node(node), cpu_online_mask) + for_each_cpu_and(cpu, cpumask_of_node(node), mask) { if (i-- == 0) return cpu; + } - for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask) { + for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) { /* Skip NUMA nodes, done above. */ if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpumask_of_node(node))) continue; -- cgit 1.4.1