From dded0317f510352ee622e526e113b9478ca406da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Douglas Anderson Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 10:04:13 -0700 Subject: soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Don't double-check rpmh payload The calls rpmh_rsc_write_ctrl_data() and rpmh_rsc_send_data() are only ever called from rpmh.c. We know that rpmh.c already error checked the message. There's no reason to do it again in rpmh-rsc. Suggested-by: Maulik Shah Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson Reviewed-by: Maulik Shah Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd Tested-by: Maulik Shah Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200413100321.v4.8.I8e187cdfb7a31f5bb7724f1f937f2862ee464a35@changeid Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson --- drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c | 18 +----------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 17 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/soc') diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c index dc4bad01c000..59ff4d17ddf5 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c @@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ done_write: } /** - * rpmh_rsc_send_data() - Validate the incoming message + write to TCS block. + * rpmh_rsc_send_data() - Write / trigger active-only message. * @drv: The controller. * @msg: The data to be sent. * @@ -659,12 +659,6 @@ int rpmh_rsc_send_data(struct rsc_drv *drv, const struct tcs_request *msg) { int ret; - if (!msg || !msg->cmds || !msg->num_cmds || - msg->num_cmds > MAX_RPMH_PAYLOAD) { - WARN_ON(1); - return -EINVAL; - } - do { ret = tcs_write(drv, msg); if (ret == -EBUSY) { @@ -735,16 +729,6 @@ int rpmh_rsc_write_ctrl_data(struct rsc_drv *drv, const struct tcs_request *msg) unsigned long flags; int ret; - if (!msg || !msg->cmds || !msg->num_cmds || - msg->num_cmds > MAX_RPMH_PAYLOAD) { - pr_err("Payload error\n"); - return -EINVAL; - } - - /* Data sent to this API will not be sent immediately */ - if (msg->state == RPMH_ACTIVE_ONLY_STATE) - return -EINVAL; - tcs = get_tcs_for_msg(drv, msg); if (IS_ERR(tcs)) return PTR_ERR(tcs); -- cgit 1.4.1