From 3ebb62ffc4e4817c3288cdf7ed67ccaf453385e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viresh Kumar Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 11:02:45 +0530 Subject: cpu_cooling: Keep only one of_cpufreq*cooling_register() helper of_cpufreq_cooling_register() isn't used by anyone and so can be removed, but then we would be left with two routines: cpufreq_cooling_register() and of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register() that would look odd. Remove current implementation of of_cpufreq_cooling_register() and rename of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register() as of_cpufreq_cooling_register(). This simplifies lots of stuff. Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c') diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c index 1e7bec7694ab..de3d104c25d7 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static void cpufreq_ready(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { struct private_data *priv = policy->driver_data; - priv->cdev = of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register(policy); + priv->cdev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy); } static struct cpufreq_driver dt_cpufreq_driver = { -- cgit 1.4.1