From 70456e5210f40ffdb8f6d905acfdcec5bd5fad9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Kara Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 12:27:42 +0200 Subject: bfq: Avoid false marking of bic as stably merged bfq_setup_cooperator() can mark bic as stably merged even though it decides to not merge its bfqqs (when bfq_setup_merge() returns NULL). Make sure to mark bic as stably merged only if we are really going to merge bfqqs. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Tested-by: "yukuai (C)" Fixes: 430a67f9d616 ("block, bfq: merge bursts of newly-created queues") Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220401102752.8599-1-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'block/bfq-iosched.c') diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 2e0dd68a3cbe..6d122c28086e 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -2895,9 +2895,12 @@ bfq_setup_cooperator(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq = bfq_setup_merge(bfqq, stable_merge_bfqq); - bic->stably_merged = true; - if (new_bfqq && new_bfqq->bic) - new_bfqq->bic->stably_merged = true; + if (new_bfqq) { + bic->stably_merged = true; + if (new_bfqq->bic) + new_bfqq->bic->stably_merged = + true; + } return new_bfqq; } else return NULL; -- cgit 1.4.1 From c1cee4ab36acef271be9101590756ed0c0c374d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Kara Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 12:27:43 +0200 Subject: bfq: Avoid merging queues with different parents It can happen that the parent of a bfqq changes between the moment we decide two queues are worth to merge (and set bic->stable_merge_bfqq) and the moment bfq_setup_merge() is called. This can happen e.g. because the process submitted IO for a different cgroup and thus bfqq got reparented. It can even happen that the bfqq we are merging with has parent cgroup that is already offline and going to be destroyed in which case the merge can lead to use-after-free issues such as: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __bfq_deactivate_entity+0x9cb/0xa50 Read of size 8 at addr ffff88800693c0c0 by task runc:[2:INIT]/10544 CPU: 0 PID: 10544 Comm: runc:[2:INIT] Tainted: G E 5.15.2-0.g5fb85fd-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed (unreleased) f1f3b891c72369aebecd2e43e4641a6358867c70 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x46/0x5a print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1f/0x140 ? __bfq_deactivate_entity+0x9cb/0xa50 kasan_report.cold+0x7f/0x11b ? __bfq_deactivate_entity+0x9cb/0xa50 __bfq_deactivate_entity+0x9cb/0xa50 ? update_curr+0x32f/0x5d0 bfq_deactivate_entity+0xa0/0x1d0 bfq_del_bfqq_busy+0x28a/0x420 ? resched_curr+0x116/0x1d0 ? bfq_requeue_bfqq+0x70/0x70 ? check_preempt_wakeup+0x52b/0xbc0 __bfq_bfqq_expire+0x1a2/0x270 bfq_bfqq_expire+0xd16/0x2160 ? try_to_wake_up+0x4ee/0x1260 ? bfq_end_wr_async_queues+0xe0/0xe0 ? _raw_write_unlock_bh+0x60/0x60 ? _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x81/0xe0 bfq_idle_slice_timer+0x109/0x280 ? bfq_dispatch_request+0x4870/0x4870 __hrtimer_run_queues+0x37d/0x700 ? enqueue_hrtimer+0x1b0/0x1b0 ? kvm_clock_get_cycles+0xd/0x10 ? ktime_get_update_offsets_now+0x6f/0x280 hrtimer_interrupt+0x2c8/0x740 Fix the problem by checking that the parent of the two bfqqs we are merging in bfq_setup_merge() is the same. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20211125172809.GC19572@quack2.suse.cz/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 430a67f9d616 ("block, bfq: merge bursts of newly-created queues") Tested-by: "yukuai (C)" Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220401102752.8599-2-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) (limited to 'block/bfq-iosched.c') diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 6d122c28086e..7d00b21ebe5d 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -2758,6 +2758,14 @@ bfq_setup_merge(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq) if (process_refs == 0 || new_process_refs == 0) return NULL; + /* + * Make sure merged queues belong to the same parent. Parents could + * have changed since the time we decided the two queues are suitable + * for merging. + */ + if (new_bfqq->entity.parent != bfqq->entity.parent) + return NULL; + bfq_log_bfqq(bfqq->bfqd, bfqq, "scheduling merge with queue %d", new_bfqq->pid); -- cgit 1.4.1 From 3bc5e683c67d94bd839a1da2e796c15847b51b69 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Kara Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 12:27:44 +0200 Subject: bfq: Split shared queues on move between cgroups When bfqq is shared by multiple processes it can happen that one of the processes gets moved to a different cgroup (or just starts submitting IO for different cgroup). In case that happens we need to split the merged bfqq as otherwise we will have IO for multiple cgroups in one bfqq and we will just account IO time to wrong entities etc. Similarly if the bfqq is scheduled to merge with another bfqq but the merge didn't happen yet, cancel the merge as it need not be valid anymore. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: e21b7a0b9887 ("block, bfq: add full hierarchical scheduling and cgroups support") Tested-by: "yukuai (C)" Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220401102752.8599-3-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- block/bfq-cgroup.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- block/bfq-iosched.c | 2 +- block/bfq-iosched.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'block/bfq-iosched.c') diff --git a/block/bfq-cgroup.c b/block/bfq-cgroup.c index 420eda2589c0..9352f3cc2377 100644 --- a/block/bfq-cgroup.c +++ b/block/bfq-cgroup.c @@ -743,9 +743,39 @@ static struct bfq_group *__bfq_bic_change_cgroup(struct bfq_data *bfqd, } if (sync_bfqq) { - entity = &sync_bfqq->entity; - if (entity->sched_data != &bfqg->sched_data) - bfq_bfqq_move(bfqd, sync_bfqq, bfqg); + if (!sync_bfqq->new_bfqq && !bfq_bfqq_coop(sync_bfqq)) { + /* We are the only user of this bfqq, just move it */ + if (sync_bfqq->entity.sched_data != &bfqg->sched_data) + bfq_bfqq_move(bfqd, sync_bfqq, bfqg); + } else { + struct bfq_queue *bfqq; + + /* + * The queue was merged to a different queue. Check + * that the merge chain still belongs to the same + * cgroup. + */ + for (bfqq = sync_bfqq; bfqq; bfqq = bfqq->new_bfqq) + if (bfqq->entity.sched_data != + &bfqg->sched_data) + break; + if (bfqq) { + /* + * Some queue changed cgroup so the merge is + * not valid anymore. We cannot easily just + * cancel the merge (by clearing new_bfqq) as + * there may be other processes using this + * queue and holding refs to all queues below + * sync_bfqq->new_bfqq. Similarly if the merge + * already happened, we need to detach from + * bfqq now so that we cannot merge bio to a + * request from the old cgroup. + */ + bfq_put_cooperator(sync_bfqq); + bfq_release_process_ref(bfqd, sync_bfqq); + bic_set_bfqq(bic, NULL, 1); + } + } } return bfqg; diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 7d00b21ebe5d..89fe3f85eb3c 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -5315,7 +5315,7 @@ static void bfq_put_stable_ref(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) bfq_put_queue(bfqq); } -static void bfq_put_cooperator(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) +void bfq_put_cooperator(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) { struct bfq_queue *__bfqq, *next; diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.h b/block/bfq-iosched.h index 3b83e3d1c2e5..a56763045d19 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.h +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.h @@ -979,6 +979,7 @@ void bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_data *bfqd, void bfq_bfqq_expire(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, bool compensate, enum bfqq_expiration reason); void bfq_put_queue(struct bfq_queue *bfqq); +void bfq_put_cooperator(struct bfq_queue *bfqq); void bfq_end_wr_async_queues(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_group *bfqg); void bfq_release_process_ref(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq); void bfq_schedule_dispatch(struct bfq_data *bfqd); -- cgit 1.4.1 From ea591cd4eb270393810e7be01feb8fde6a34fbbe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Kara Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 12:27:45 +0200 Subject: bfq: Update cgroup information before merging bio When the process is migrated to a different cgroup (or in case of writeback just starts submitting bios associated with a different cgroup) bfq_merge_bio() can operate with stale cgroup information in bic. Thus the bio can be merged to a request from a different cgroup or it can result in merging of bfqqs for different cgroups or bfqqs of already dead cgroups and causing possible use-after-free issues. Fix the problem by updating cgroup information in bfq_merge_bio(). CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: e21b7a0b9887 ("block, bfq: add full hierarchical scheduling and cgroups support") Tested-by: "yukuai (C)" Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220401102752.8599-4-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'block/bfq-iosched.c') diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 89fe3f85eb3c..1fc4d4628fba 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -2457,10 +2457,17 @@ static bool bfq_bio_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio, spin_lock_irq(&bfqd->lock); - if (bic) + if (bic) { + /* + * Make sure cgroup info is uptodate for current process before + * considering the merge. + */ + bfq_bic_update_cgroup(bic, bio); + bfqd->bio_bfqq = bic_to_bfqq(bic, op_is_sync(bio->bi_opf)); - else + } else { bfqd->bio_bfqq = NULL; + } bfqd->bio_bic = bic; ret = blk_mq_sched_try_merge(q, bio, nr_segs, &free); -- cgit 1.4.1 From fc84e1f941b91221092da5b3102ec82da24c5673 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Kara Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 12:27:46 +0200 Subject: bfq: Drop pointless unlock-lock pair In bfq_insert_request() we unlock bfqd->lock only to call trace_block_rq_insert() and then lock bfqd->lock again. This is really pointless since tracing is disabled if we really care about performance and even if the tracepoint is enabled, it is a quick call. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Tested-by: "yukuai (C)" Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220401102752.8599-5-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'block/bfq-iosched.c') diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 1fc4d4628fba..19082e14f3c1 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -6150,11 +6150,8 @@ static void bfq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq, return; } - spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd->lock); - trace_block_rq_insert(rq); - spin_lock_irq(&bfqd->lock); bfqq = bfq_init_rq(rq); if (!bfqq || at_head) { if (at_head) -- cgit 1.4.1 From 5f550ede5edf846ecc0067be1ba80514e6fe7f8e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Kara Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 12:27:47 +0200 Subject: bfq: Remove pointless bfq_init_rq() calls We call bfq_init_rq() from request merging functions where requests we get should have already gone through bfq_init_rq() during insert and anyway we want to do anything only if the request is already tracked by BFQ. So replace calls to bfq_init_rq() with RQ_BFQQ() instead to simply skip requests untracked by BFQ. We move bfq_init_rq() call in bfq_insert_request() a bit earlier to cover request merging and thus can transfer FIFO position in case of a merge. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Tested-by: "yukuai (C)" Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220401102752.8599-6-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'block/bfq-iosched.c') diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 19082e14f3c1..d7cf930b47bb 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -2497,8 +2497,6 @@ static int bfq_request_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct request **req, return ELEVATOR_NO_MERGE; } -static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq); - static void bfq_request_merged(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req, enum elv_merge type) { @@ -2507,7 +2505,7 @@ static void bfq_request_merged(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req, blk_rq_pos(req) < blk_rq_pos(container_of(rb_prev(&req->rb_node), struct request, rb_node))) { - struct bfq_queue *bfqq = bfq_init_rq(req); + struct bfq_queue *bfqq = RQ_BFQQ(req); struct bfq_data *bfqd; struct request *prev, *next_rq; @@ -2559,8 +2557,8 @@ static void bfq_request_merged(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req, static void bfq_requests_merged(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq, struct request *next) { - struct bfq_queue *bfqq = bfq_init_rq(rq), - *next_bfqq = bfq_init_rq(next); + struct bfq_queue *bfqq = RQ_BFQQ(rq), + *next_bfqq = RQ_BFQQ(next); if (!bfqq) goto remove; @@ -6129,6 +6127,8 @@ static inline void bfq_update_insert_stats(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int cmd_flags) {} #endif /* CONFIG_BFQ_CGROUP_DEBUG */ +static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq); + static void bfq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq, bool at_head) { @@ -6144,6 +6144,7 @@ static void bfq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq, bfqg_stats_update_legacy_io(q, rq); #endif spin_lock_irq(&bfqd->lock); + bfqq = bfq_init_rq(rq); if (blk_mq_sched_try_insert_merge(q, rq, &free)) { spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd->lock); blk_mq_free_requests(&free); @@ -6152,7 +6153,6 @@ static void bfq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq, trace_block_rq_insert(rq); - bfqq = bfq_init_rq(rq); if (!bfqq || at_head) { if (at_head) list_add(&rq->queuelist, &bfqd->dispatch); -- cgit 1.4.1 From 4e54a2493e582361adc3bfbf06c7d50d19d18837 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Kara Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 12:27:49 +0200 Subject: bfq: Get rid of __bio_blkcg() usage BFQ usage of __bio_blkcg() is a relict from the past. Furthermore if bio would not be associated with any blkcg, the usage of __bio_blkcg() in BFQ is prone to races with the task being migrated between cgroups as __bio_blkcg() calls at different places could return different blkcgs. Convert BFQ to the new situation where bio->bi_blkg is initialized in bio_set_dev() and thus practically always valid. This allows us to save blkcg_gq lookup and noticeably simplify the code. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 0fe061b9f03c ("blkcg: fix ref count issue with bio_blkcg() using task_css") Tested-by: "yukuai (C)" Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220401102752.8599-8-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- block/bfq-cgroup.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------- block/bfq-iosched.c | 11 +--------- block/bfq-iosched.h | 3 +-- 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-) (limited to 'block/bfq-iosched.c') diff --git a/block/bfq-cgroup.c b/block/bfq-cgroup.c index 879380c2bc7e..32d2c2a47480 100644 --- a/block/bfq-cgroup.c +++ b/block/bfq-cgroup.c @@ -586,27 +586,11 @@ static void bfq_group_set_parent(struct bfq_group *bfqg, entity->sched_data = &parent->sched_data; } -static struct bfq_group *bfq_lookup_bfqg(struct bfq_data *bfqd, - struct blkcg *blkcg) +static void bfq_link_bfqg(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_group *bfqg) { - struct blkcg_gq *blkg; - - blkg = blkg_lookup(blkcg, bfqd->queue); - if (likely(blkg)) - return blkg_to_bfqg(blkg); - return NULL; -} - -struct bfq_group *bfq_find_set_group(struct bfq_data *bfqd, - struct blkcg *blkcg) -{ - struct bfq_group *bfqg, *parent; + struct bfq_group *parent; struct bfq_entity *entity; - bfqg = bfq_lookup_bfqg(bfqd, blkcg); - if (unlikely(!bfqg)) - return NULL; - /* * Update chain of bfq_groups as we might be handling a leaf group * which, along with some of its relatives, has not been hooked yet @@ -623,8 +607,15 @@ struct bfq_group *bfq_find_set_group(struct bfq_data *bfqd, bfq_group_set_parent(curr_bfqg, parent); } } +} - return bfqg; +struct bfq_group *bfq_bio_bfqg(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bio *bio) +{ + struct blkcg_gq *blkg = bio->bi_blkg; + + if (!blkg) + return bfqd->root_group; + return blkg_to_bfqg(blkg); } /** @@ -714,25 +705,15 @@ void bfq_bfqq_move(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, * Move bic to blkcg, assuming that bfqd->lock is held; which makes * sure that the reference to cgroup is valid across the call (see * comments in bfq_bic_update_cgroup on this issue) - * - * NOTE: an alternative approach might have been to store the current - * cgroup in bfqq and getting a reference to it, reducing the lookup - * time here, at the price of slightly more complex code. */ -static struct bfq_group *__bfq_bic_change_cgroup(struct bfq_data *bfqd, - struct bfq_io_cq *bic, - struct blkcg *blkcg) +static void *__bfq_bic_change_cgroup(struct bfq_data *bfqd, + struct bfq_io_cq *bic, + struct bfq_group *bfqg) { struct bfq_queue *async_bfqq = bic_to_bfqq(bic, 0); struct bfq_queue *sync_bfqq = bic_to_bfqq(bic, 1); - struct bfq_group *bfqg; struct bfq_entity *entity; - bfqg = bfq_find_set_group(bfqd, blkcg); - - if (unlikely(!bfqg)) - bfqg = bfqd->root_group; - if (async_bfqq) { entity = &async_bfqq->entity; @@ -784,20 +765,24 @@ static struct bfq_group *__bfq_bic_change_cgroup(struct bfq_data *bfqd, void bfq_bic_update_cgroup(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, struct bio *bio) { struct bfq_data *bfqd = bic_to_bfqd(bic); - struct bfq_group *bfqg = NULL; + struct bfq_group *bfqg = bfq_bio_bfqg(bfqd, bio); uint64_t serial_nr; - rcu_read_lock(); - serial_nr = __bio_blkcg(bio)->css.serial_nr; + serial_nr = bfqg_to_blkg(bfqg)->blkcg->css.serial_nr; /* * Check whether blkcg has changed. The condition may trigger * spuriously on a newly created cic but there's no harm. */ if (unlikely(!bfqd) || likely(bic->blkcg_serial_nr == serial_nr)) - goto out; + return; - bfqg = __bfq_bic_change_cgroup(bfqd, bic, __bio_blkcg(bio)); + /* + * New cgroup for this process. Make sure it is linked to bfq internal + * cgroup hierarchy. + */ + bfq_link_bfqg(bfqd, bfqg); + __bfq_bic_change_cgroup(bfqd, bic, bfqg); /* * Update blkg_path for bfq_log_* functions. We cache this * path, and update it here, for the following @@ -850,8 +835,6 @@ void bfq_bic_update_cgroup(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, struct bio *bio) */ blkg_path(bfqg_to_blkg(bfqg), bfqg->blkg_path, sizeof(bfqg->blkg_path)); bic->blkcg_serial_nr = serial_nr; -out: - rcu_read_unlock(); } /** @@ -1469,7 +1452,7 @@ void bfq_end_wr_async(struct bfq_data *bfqd) bfq_end_wr_async_queues(bfqd, bfqd->root_group); } -struct bfq_group *bfq_find_set_group(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct blkcg *blkcg) +struct bfq_group *bfq_bio_bfqg(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bio *bio) { return bfqd->root_group; } diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index d7cf930b47bb..e47c75f1fa0f 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -5726,14 +5726,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_get_queue(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq; struct bfq_group *bfqg; - rcu_read_lock(); - - bfqg = bfq_find_set_group(bfqd, __bio_blkcg(bio)); - if (!bfqg) { - bfqq = &bfqd->oom_bfqq; - goto out; - } - + bfqg = bfq_bio_bfqg(bfqd, bio); if (!is_sync) { async_bfqq = bfq_async_queue_prio(bfqd, bfqg, ioprio_class, ioprio); @@ -5779,8 +5772,6 @@ out: if (bfqq != &bfqd->oom_bfqq && is_sync && !respawn) bfqq = bfq_do_or_sched_stable_merge(bfqd, bfqq, bic); - - rcu_read_unlock(); return bfqq; } diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.h b/block/bfq-iosched.h index 4664e2f3e828..978ef5d6fe6a 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.h +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.h @@ -1009,8 +1009,7 @@ void bfq_bfqq_move(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, void bfq_init_entity(struct bfq_entity *entity, struct bfq_group *bfqg); void bfq_bic_update_cgroup(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, struct bio *bio); void bfq_end_wr_async(struct bfq_data *bfqd); -struct bfq_group *bfq_find_set_group(struct bfq_data *bfqd, - struct blkcg *blkcg); +struct bfq_group *bfq_bio_bfqg(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bio *bio); struct blkcg_gq *bfqg_to_blkg(struct bfq_group *bfqg); struct bfq_group *bfqq_group(struct bfq_queue *bfqq); struct bfq_group *bfq_create_group_hierarchy(struct bfq_data *bfqd, int node); -- cgit 1.4.1 From 181490d5321806e537dc5386db5ea640b826bf78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yu Kuai Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 10:35:06 +0800 Subject: block, bfq: protect 'bfqd->queued' by 'bfqd->lock' If bfq_schedule_dispatch() is called from bfq_idle_slice_timer_body(), then 'bfqd->queued' is read without holding 'bfqd->lock'. This is wrong since it can be wrote concurrently. Fix the problem by holding 'bfqd->lock' in such case. Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220513023507.2625717-2-yukuai3@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'block/bfq-iosched.c') diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index e47c75f1fa0f..62180dda6bf9 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -456,6 +456,8 @@ static struct bfq_io_cq *bfq_bic_lookup(struct request_queue *q) */ void bfq_schedule_dispatch(struct bfq_data *bfqd) { + lockdep_assert_held(&bfqd->lock); + if (bfqd->queued != 0) { bfq_log(bfqd, "schedule dispatch"); blk_mq_run_hw_queues(bfqd->queue, true); @@ -6892,8 +6894,8 @@ bfq_idle_slice_timer_body(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq) bfq_bfqq_expire(bfqd, bfqq, true, reason); schedule_dispatch: - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bfqd->lock, flags); bfq_schedule_dispatch(bfqd); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bfqd->lock, flags); } /* -- cgit 1.4.1 From ddc25c86b466d2359b57bc7798f167baa1735a44 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yu Kuai Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 10:35:07 +0800 Subject: block, bfq: make bfq_has_work() more accurate bfq_has_work() is using busy_queues currently, which is not accurate because bfq_queue is busy doesn't represent that it has requests. Since bfqd aready has a counter 'queued' to record how many requests are in bfq, use it instead of busy_queues. Noted that bfq_has_work() can be called with 'bfqd->lock' held, thus the lock can't be held in bfq_has_work() to protect 'bfqd->queued'. Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220513023507.2625717-3-yukuai3@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'block/bfq-iosched.c') diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 62180dda6bf9..92f0a829a804 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -2204,7 +2204,11 @@ static void bfq_add_request(struct request *rq) bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd, bfqq, "add_request %d", rq_is_sync(rq)); bfqq->queued[rq_is_sync(rq)]++; - bfqd->queued++; + /* + * Updating of 'bfqd->queued' is protected by 'bfqd->lock', however, it + * may be read without holding the lock in bfq_has_work(). + */ + WRITE_ONCE(bfqd->queued, bfqd->queued + 1); if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqq->sort_list) && bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq)) { bfq_check_waker(bfqd, bfqq, now_ns); @@ -2396,7 +2400,11 @@ static void bfq_remove_request(struct request_queue *q, if (rq->queuelist.prev != &rq->queuelist) list_del_init(&rq->queuelist); bfqq->queued[sync]--; - bfqd->queued--; + /* + * Updating of 'bfqd->queued' is protected by 'bfqd->lock', however, it + * may be read without holding the lock in bfq_has_work(). + */ + WRITE_ONCE(bfqd->queued, bfqd->queued - 1); elv_rb_del(&bfqq->sort_list, rq); elv_rqhash_del(q, rq); @@ -5057,11 +5065,11 @@ static bool bfq_has_work(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx) struct bfq_data *bfqd = hctx->queue->elevator->elevator_data; /* - * Avoiding lock: a race on bfqd->busy_queues should cause at + * Avoiding lock: a race on bfqd->queued should cause at * most a call to dispatch for nothing */ return !list_empty_careful(&bfqd->dispatch) || - bfq_tot_busy_queues(bfqd) > 0; + READ_ONCE(bfqd->queued); } static struct request *__bfq_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx) -- cgit 1.4.1 From f950667356ce90a41b446b726d4595a10cb65415 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Kara Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 12:52:29 +0200 Subject: bfq: Relax waker detection for shared queues Currently we look for waker only if current queue has no requests. This makes sense for bfq queues with a single process however for shared queues when there is a larger number of processes the condition that queue has no requests is difficult to meet because often at least one process has some request in flight although all the others are waiting for the waker to do the work and this harms throughput. Relax the "no queued request for bfq queue" condition to "the current task has no queued requests yet". For this, we also need to start tracking number of requests in flight for each task. This patch (together with the following one) restores the performance for dbench with 128 clients that regressed with commit c65e6fd460b4 ("bfq: Do not let waker requests skip proper accounting") because this commit makes requests of wakers properly enter BFQ queues and thus these queues become ineligible for the old waker detection logic. Dbench results: Vanilla 5.18-rc3 5.18-rc3 + revert 5.18-rc3 patched Mean 1237.36 ( 0.00%) 950.16 * 23.21%* 988.35 * 20.12%* Numbers are time to complete workload so lower is better. Fixes: c65e6fd460b4 ("bfq: Do not let waker requests skip proper accounting") Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220519105235.31397-1-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 5 +++-- block/bfq-iosched.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'block/bfq-iosched.c') diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 92f0a829a804..7545f589d8c3 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -2129,7 +2129,6 @@ static void bfq_check_waker(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, if (!bfqd->last_completed_rq_bfqq || bfqd->last_completed_rq_bfqq == bfqq || bfq_bfqq_has_short_ttime(bfqq) || - bfqq->dispatched > 0 || now_ns - bfqd->last_completion >= 4 * NSEC_PER_MSEC || bfqd->last_completed_rq_bfqq == bfqq->waker_bfqq) return; @@ -2210,7 +2209,7 @@ static void bfq_add_request(struct request *rq) */ WRITE_ONCE(bfqd->queued, bfqd->queued + 1); - if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqq->sort_list) && bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq)) { + if (bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq) && RQ_BIC(rq)->requests <= 1) { bfq_check_waker(bfqd, bfqq, now_ns); /* @@ -6573,6 +6572,7 @@ static void bfq_finish_requeue_request(struct request *rq) bfq_completed_request(bfqq, bfqd); } bfq_finish_requeue_request_body(bfqq); + RQ_BIC(rq)->requests--; spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bfqd->lock, flags); /* @@ -6806,6 +6806,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq) bfqq_request_allocated(bfqq); bfqq->ref++; + bic->requests++; bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd, bfqq, "get_request %p: bfqq %p, %d", rq, bfqq, bfqq->ref); diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.h b/block/bfq-iosched.h index b18d6c31c225..ca8177d7bf7c 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.h +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.h @@ -468,6 +468,7 @@ struct bfq_io_cq { struct bfq_queue *stable_merge_bfqq; bool stably_merged; /* non splittable if true */ + unsigned int requests; /* Number of requests this process has in flight */ }; /** -- cgit 1.4.1 From c5ac56bb6110e42e79d3106866658376b2e48ab9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Kara Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 12:52:30 +0200 Subject: bfq: Allow current waker to defend against a tentative one The code in bfq_check_waker() ignores wake up events from the current waker. This makes it more likely we select a new tentative waker although the current one is generating more wake up events. Treat current waker the same way as any other process and allow it to reset the waker detection logic. Fixes: 71217df39dc6 ("block, bfq: make waker-queue detection more robust") Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220519105235.31397-2-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'block/bfq-iosched.c') diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 7545f589d8c3..9e1d713de942 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -2129,8 +2129,7 @@ static void bfq_check_waker(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, if (!bfqd->last_completed_rq_bfqq || bfqd->last_completed_rq_bfqq == bfqq || bfq_bfqq_has_short_ttime(bfqq) || - now_ns - bfqd->last_completion >= 4 * NSEC_PER_MSEC || - bfqd->last_completed_rq_bfqq == bfqq->waker_bfqq) + now_ns - bfqd->last_completion >= 4 * NSEC_PER_MSEC) return; /* -- cgit 1.4.1 From e79cf8892e332b9dafc99aef02189a2897eced24 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Kara Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 12:52:31 +0200 Subject: bfq: Remove superfluous conversion from RQ_BIC() We store struct bfq_io_cq pointer in rq->elv.priv[0] in bfq_init_rq(). Thus a call to icq_to_bic() in RQ_BIC() is wrong. Luckily it does no harm currently because struct io_iq is the first one in struct bfq_io_cq. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220519105235.31397-3-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'block/bfq-iosched.c') diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 9e1d713de942..62de9f865610 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ static const unsigned long bfq_activation_stable_merging = 600; */ static const unsigned long bfq_late_stable_merging = 600; -#define RQ_BIC(rq) icq_to_bic((rq)->elv.priv[0]) +#define RQ_BIC(rq) ((struct bfq_io_cq *)((rq)->elv.priv[0])) #define RQ_BFQQ(rq) ((rq)->elv.priv[1]) struct bfq_queue *bic_to_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, bool is_sync) -- cgit 1.4.1 From a249ca7dfbce1eb82bcd3a5a6bb21daeade20469 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Kara Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 12:52:32 +0200 Subject: bfq: Remove bfq_requeue_request_body() The function has only a single caller and two lines. Just remove it since it is pointless and just harming readability. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220519105235.31397-4-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 9 ++------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'block/bfq-iosched.c') diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 62de9f865610..038e075e05b8 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -6368,12 +6368,6 @@ static void bfq_completed_request(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_data *bfqd) bfq_schedule_dispatch(bfqd); } -static void bfq_finish_requeue_request_body(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) -{ - bfqq_request_freed(bfqq); - bfq_put_queue(bfqq); -} - /* * The processes associated with bfqq may happen to generate their * cumulative I/O at a lower rate than the rate at which the device @@ -6570,7 +6564,8 @@ static void bfq_finish_requeue_request(struct request *rq) bfq_completed_request(bfqq, bfqd); } - bfq_finish_requeue_request_body(bfqq); + bfqq_request_freed(bfqq); + bfq_put_queue(bfqq); RQ_BIC(rq)->requests--; spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bfqd->lock, flags); -- cgit 1.4.1