From 308472c69213cea9b22a2156a19ea9ec06ea3bc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marc Zyngier Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 17:25:09 +0100 Subject: KVM: arm64: sve: Use __vcpu_sys_reg() instead of raw sys_regs access Now that we have a wrapper for the sysreg accesses, let's use that consistently. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier --- arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/arm64/kvm') diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c index e329a36b2bee..e503caff14d1 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c @@ -109,12 +109,10 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_put_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) local_irq_save(flags); if (vcpu->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_FP_ENABLED) { - u64 *guest_zcr = &vcpu->arch.ctxt.sys_regs[ZCR_EL1]; - fpsimd_save_and_flush_cpu_state(); if (guest_has_sve) - *guest_zcr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_ZCR_EL12); + __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, ZCR_EL1) = read_sysreg_s(SYS_ZCR_EL12); } else if (host_has_sve) { /* * The FPSIMD/SVE state in the CPU has not been touched, and we -- cgit 1.4.1