diff options
| author | Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> | 2018-09-04 15:46:06 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2018-09-04 16:45:02 -0700 |
| commit | 328b5f417a4ac929e20d98b989a2babac66c8520 (patch) | |
| tree | 03283b079776257d6319e5838c2eda9ab8dc1fdf /scripts | |
| parent | 9c21dae291d1b7763b749dfaef3fb911286c0d98 (diff) | |
| download | linux-328b5f417a4ac929e20d98b989a2babac66c8520.tar.gz | |
checkpatch: add optional static const to blank line declarations test
Using a static const struct definition as part of a series of
declarations produces a false positive "Missing a blank line after
declarations" for code like:
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
#710: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_scale_coefs.c:137:
+ int inc;
+ static const struct {
So fix it.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5905126e70b0ed1781e49265fd5c49c5090d0223.camel@perches.com
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Reported-by: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>
Cc: "Valkeinen, Tomi" <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'scripts')
| -rwxr-xr-x | scripts/checkpatch.pl | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl index 5219280bf7ff..b4caee6e269c 100755 --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl @@ -3311,7 +3311,7 @@ sub process { # known declaration macros $sline =~ /^\+\s+$declaration_macros/ || # start of struct or union or enum - $sline =~ /^\+\s+(?:union|struct|enum|typedef)\b/ || + $sline =~ /^\+\s+(?:static\s+)?(?:const\s+)?(?:union|struct|enum|typedef)\b/ || # start or end of block or continuation of declaration $sline =~ /^\+\s+(?:$|[\{\}\.\#\"\?\:\(\[])/ || # bitfield continuation |