summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>2020-05-15 19:22:15 +0200
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2020-05-15 12:30:13 -0700
commit90bf45134d55d626ae2713cac50cda10c6c8b0c2 (patch)
tree03acba9e0f9f038350654ad942bca2dfafe2d970 /net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
parentca1c933bcee9393d8a83c6be1093471e0c3b655d (diff)
downloadlinux-90bf45134d55d626ae2713cac50cda10c6c8b0c2.tar.gz
mptcp: add new sock flag to deal with join subflows
MP_JOIN subflows must not land into the accept queue.
Currently tcp_check_req() calls an mptcp specific helper
to detect such scenario.

Such helper leverages the subflow context to check for
MP_JOIN subflows. We need to deal also with MP JOIN
failures, even when the subflow context is not available
due allocation failure.

A possible solution would be changing the syn_recv_sock()
signature to allow returning a more descriptive action/
error code and deal with that in tcp_check_req().

Since the above need is MPTCP specific, this patch instead
uses a TCP request socket hole to add a MPTCP specific flag.
Such flag is used by the MPTCP syn_recv_sock() to tell
tcp_check_req() how to deal with the request socket.

This change is a no-op for !MPTCP build, and makes the
MPTCP code simpler. It allows also the next patch to deal
correctly with MP JOIN failure.

v1 -> v2:
 - be more conservative on drop_req initialization (Mat)

RFC -> v1:
 - move the drop_req bit inside tcp_request_sock (Eric)

Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c')
-rw-r--r--net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
index 7e40322cc5ec..495dda2449fe 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
@@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ struct sock *tcp_check_req(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	if (!child)
 		goto listen_overflow;
 
-	if (own_req && sk_is_mptcp(child) && mptcp_sk_is_subflow(child)) {
+	if (own_req && rsk_drop_req(req)) {
 		reqsk_queue_removed(&inet_csk(sk)->icsk_accept_queue, req);
 		inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop_and_put(sk, req);
 		return child;