diff options
author | Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> | 2021-03-24 21:37:23 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2021-03-25 09:22:55 -0700 |
commit | c2655835fd8cabdfe7dab737253de3ffb88da126 (patch) | |
tree | 978841d56b0642a485277181117a4c5f12d9b8c7 /mm/mmu_notifier.c | |
parent | cf10bd4c4aff8dd64d1aa7f2a529d0c672bc16af (diff) | |
download | linux-c2655835fd8cabdfe7dab737253de3ffb88da126.tar.gz |
mm/mmu_notifiers: ensure range_end() is paired with range_start()
If one or more notifiers fails .invalidate_range_start(), invoke .invalidate_range_end() for "all" notifiers. If there are multiple notifiers, those that did not fail are expecting _start() and _end() to be paired, e.g. KVM's mmu_notifier_count would become imbalanced. Disallow notifiers that can fail _start() from implementing _end() so that it's unnecessary to either track which notifiers rejected _start(), or had already succeeded prior to a failed _start(). Note, the existing behavior of calling _start() on all notifiers even after a previous notifier failed _start() was an unintented "feature". Make it canon now that the behavior is depended on for correctness. As of today, the bug is likely benign: 1. The only caller of the non-blocking notifier is OOM kill. 2. The only notifiers that can fail _start() are the i915 and Nouveau drivers. 3. The only notifiers that utilize _end() are the SGI UV GRU driver and KVM. 4. The GRU driver will never coincide with the i195/Nouveau drivers. 5. An imbalanced kvm->mmu_notifier_count only causes soft lockup in the _guest_, and the guest is already doomed due to being an OOM victim. Fix the bug now to play nice with future usage, e.g. KVM has a potential use case for blocking memslot updates in KVM while an invalidation is in-progress, and failure to unblock would result in said updates being blocked indefinitely and hanging. Found by inspection. Verified by adding a second notifier in KVM that periodically returns -EAGAIN on non-blockable ranges, triggering OOM, and observing that KVM exits with an elevated notifier count. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210311180057.1582638-1-seanjc@google.com Fixes: 93065ac753e4 ("mm, oom: distinguish blockable mode for mmu notifiers") Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/mmu_notifier.c')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/mmu_notifier.c | 23 |
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/mm/mmu_notifier.c b/mm/mmu_notifier.c index 61ee40ed804e..459d195d2ff6 100644 --- a/mm/mmu_notifier.c +++ b/mm/mmu_notifier.c @@ -501,10 +501,33 @@ static int mn_hlist_invalidate_range_start( ""); WARN_ON(mmu_notifier_range_blockable(range) || _ret != -EAGAIN); + /* + * We call all the notifiers on any EAGAIN, + * there is no way for a notifier to know if + * its start method failed, thus a start that + * does EAGAIN can't also do end. + */ + WARN_ON(ops->invalidate_range_end); ret = _ret; } } } + + if (ret) { + /* + * Must be non-blocking to get here. If there are multiple + * notifiers and one or more failed start, any that succeeded + * start are expecting their end to be called. Do so now. + */ + hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(subscription, &subscriptions->list, + hlist, srcu_read_lock_held(&srcu)) { + if (!subscription->ops->invalidate_range_end) + continue; + + subscription->ops->invalidate_range_end(subscription, + range); + } + } srcu_read_unlock(&srcu, id); return ret; |