summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/mm/memcontrol.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBalbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>2008-02-07 00:14:02 -0800
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org>2008-02-07 08:42:19 -0800
commite1a1cd590e3fcb0d2e230128daf2337ea55387dc (patch)
treeeb660ab340c657a1eb595b2d4d8e8b62783bf6fb /mm/memcontrol.c
parentbed7161a519a2faef53e1bce1b47595e297c1d14 (diff)
downloadlinux-e1a1cd590e3fcb0d2e230128daf2337ea55387dc.tar.gz
Memory controller: make charging gfp mask aware
Nick Piggin pointed out that swap cache and page cache addition routines
could be called from non GFP_KERNEL contexts.  This patch makes the
charging routine aware of the gfp context.  Charging might fail if the
cgroup is over it's limit, in which case a suitable error is returned.

This patch was tested on a Powerpc box.  I am still looking at being able
to test the path, through which allocations happen in non GFP_KERNEL
contexts.

[kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com: problem with ZONE_MOVABLE]
Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>
Cc: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
Cc: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/memcontrol.c')
-rw-r--r--mm/memcontrol.c24
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index ff7cac602984..ac8774426fec 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -261,7 +261,8 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
  * 0 if the charge was successful
  * < 0 if the cgroup is over its limit
  */
-int mem_cgroup_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm)
+int mem_cgroup_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
+				gfp_t gfp_mask)
 {
 	struct mem_cgroup *mem;
 	struct page_cgroup *pc, *race_pc;
@@ -293,7 +294,7 @@ retry:
 
 	unlock_page_cgroup(page);
 
-	pc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct page_cgroup), GFP_KERNEL);
+	pc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct page_cgroup), gfp_mask);
 	if (pc == NULL)
 		goto err;
 
@@ -320,7 +321,14 @@ retry:
 	 * the cgroup limit.
 	 */
 	while (res_counter_charge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE)) {
-		if (try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(mem))
+		bool is_atomic = gfp_mask & GFP_ATOMIC;
+		/*
+		 * We cannot reclaim under GFP_ATOMIC, fail the charge
+		 */
+		if (is_atomic)
+			goto noreclaim;
+
+		if (try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(mem, gfp_mask))
 			continue;
 
 		/*
@@ -344,9 +352,10 @@ retry:
 			congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10);
 			continue;
 		}
-
+noreclaim:
 		css_put(&mem->css);
-		mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(mem, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!is_atomic)
+			mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(mem, GFP_KERNEL);
 		goto free_pc;
 	}
 
@@ -385,7 +394,8 @@ err:
 /*
  * See if the cached pages should be charged at all?
  */
-int mem_cgroup_cache_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm)
+int mem_cgroup_cache_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
+				gfp_t gfp_mask)
 {
 	struct mem_cgroup *mem;
 	if (!mm)
@@ -393,7 +403,7 @@ int mem_cgroup_cache_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm)
 
 	mem = rcu_dereference(mm->mem_cgroup);
 	if (mem->control_type == MEM_CGROUP_TYPE_ALL)
-		return mem_cgroup_charge(page, mm);
+		return mem_cgroup_charge(page, mm, gfp_mask);
 	else
 		return 0;
 }