diff options
| author | Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> | 2015-03-04 14:07:22 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> | 2015-08-17 23:38:10 -0400 |
| commit | c7f5408493aeb01532927b2276316797a03ed6ee (patch) | |
| tree | ba0cd6e3bed7a263310fa60baa623ba70dd48d65 /mm/backing-dev.c | |
| parent | e97fedb9ef9868ff24d588be781906cf7c1b59ae (diff) | |
| download | linux-c7f5408493aeb01532927b2276316797a03ed6ee.tar.gz | |
inode: rename i_wb_list to i_io_list
There's a small consistency problem between the inode and writeback naming. Writeback calls the "for IO" inode queues b_io and b_more_io, but the inode calls these the "writeback list" or i_wb_list. This makes it hard to an new "under writeback" list to the inode, or call it an "under IO" list on the bdi because either way we'll have writeback on IO and IO on writeback and it'll just be confusing. I'm getting confused just writing this! So, rename the inode "for IO" list variable to i_io_list so we can add a new "writeback list" in a subsequent patch. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tested-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/backing-dev.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/backing-dev.c | 8 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c index dac5bf59309d..ee8d7fd07be3 100644 --- a/mm/backing-dev.c +++ b/mm/backing-dev.c @@ -55,13 +55,13 @@ static int bdi_debug_stats_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) nr_dirty = nr_io = nr_more_io = nr_dirty_time = 0; spin_lock(&wb->list_lock); - list_for_each_entry(inode, &wb->b_dirty, i_wb_list) + list_for_each_entry(inode, &wb->b_dirty, i_io_list) nr_dirty++; - list_for_each_entry(inode, &wb->b_io, i_wb_list) + list_for_each_entry(inode, &wb->b_io, i_io_list) nr_io++; - list_for_each_entry(inode, &wb->b_more_io, i_wb_list) + list_for_each_entry(inode, &wb->b_more_io, i_io_list) nr_more_io++; - list_for_each_entry(inode, &wb->b_dirty_time, i_wb_list) + list_for_each_entry(inode, &wb->b_dirty_time, i_io_list) if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_TIME) nr_dirty_time++; spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock); |