summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/kernel
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>2016-11-29 12:27:09 -0500
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2016-11-30 14:50:52 -0500
commite2d2afe15ed452f91797a80dbc0a17838ba03ed4 (patch)
tree44cb85851f4f9aebe00a6405197e4766bed2cf83 /kernel
parent0fcba2894c6b370ebf4b49099d20ff6333a430f7 (diff)
downloadlinux-e2d2afe15ed452f91797a80dbc0a17838ba03ed4.tar.gz
bpf: fix states equal logic for varlen access
If we have a branch that looks something like this

int foo = map->value;
if (condition) {
  foo += blah;
} else {
  foo = bar;
}
map->array[foo] = baz;

We will incorrectly assume that the !condition branch is equal to the condition
branch as the register for foo will be UNKNOWN_VALUE in both cases.  We need to
adjust this logic to only do this if we didn't do a varlen access after we
processed the !condition branch, otherwise we have different ranges and need to
check the other branch as well.

Fixes: 484611357c19 ("bpf: allow access into map value arrays")
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/verifier.c10
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 6a936159c6e0..8199821f54cf 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2454,6 +2454,7 @@ static bool states_equal(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 			 struct bpf_verifier_state *old,
 			 struct bpf_verifier_state *cur)
 {
+	bool varlen_map_access = env->varlen_map_value_access;
 	struct bpf_reg_state *rold, *rcur;
 	int i;
 
@@ -2467,12 +2468,17 @@ static bool states_equal(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 		/* If the ranges were not the same, but everything else was and
 		 * we didn't do a variable access into a map then we are a-ok.
 		 */
-		if (!env->varlen_map_value_access &&
+		if (!varlen_map_access &&
 		    rold->type == rcur->type && rold->imm == rcur->imm)
 			continue;
 
+		/* If we didn't map access then again we don't care about the
+		 * mismatched range values and it's ok if our old type was
+		 * UNKNOWN and we didn't go to a NOT_INIT'ed reg.
+		 */
 		if (rold->type == NOT_INIT ||
-		    (rold->type == UNKNOWN_VALUE && rcur->type != NOT_INIT))
+		    (!varlen_map_access && rold->type == UNKNOWN_VALUE &&
+		     rcur->type != NOT_INIT))
 			continue;
 
 		if (rold->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && rcur->type == PTR_TO_PACKET &&