diff options
| author | David Gow <davidgow@google.com> | 2021-05-13 12:32:02 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> | 2021-06-23 16:41:24 -0600 |
| commit | 388ca2e024dd5e6fa9eb5eafa56bd33707bcd594 (patch) | |
| tree | 02eb141ec02619a6b1fe21cb24939f4c4a57599c /kernel/sysctl-test.c | |
| parent | 8f0877c26e4b695f824c5dbcc4b964ce238328aa (diff) | |
| download | linux-388ca2e024dd5e6fa9eb5eafa56bd33707bcd594.tar.gz | |
kernel/sysctl-test: Remove some casts which are no-longer required
With some of the stricter type checking in KUnit's EXPECT macros removed, several casts in sysctl-test are no longer required. Remove the unnecessary casts, making the conditions clearer. Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sysctl-test.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/sysctl-test.c | 24 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sysctl-test.c b/kernel/sysctl-test.c index ccb78509f1a8..664ded05dd7a 100644 --- a/kernel/sysctl-test.c +++ b/kernel/sysctl-test.c @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_null_tbl_data(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&null_data_table, KUNIT_PROC_READ, buffer, &len, &pos)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (size_t)0, len); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len); /* * See above. @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_null_tbl_data(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&null_data_table, KUNIT_PROC_WRITE, buffer, &len, &pos)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (size_t)0, len); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len); } /* @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_table_maxlen_unset(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&data_maxlen_unset_table, KUNIT_PROC_READ, buffer, &len, &pos)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (size_t)0, len); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len); /* * See previous comment. @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_table_maxlen_unset(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&data_maxlen_unset_table, KUNIT_PROC_WRITE, buffer, &len, &pos)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (size_t)0, len); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len); } /* @@ -135,11 +135,11 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_table_len_is_zero(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, KUNIT_PROC_READ, buffer, &len, &pos)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (size_t)0, len); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, KUNIT_PROC_WRITE, buffer, &len, &pos)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (size_t)0, len); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len); } /* @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_table_read_but_position_set( KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, KUNIT_PROC_READ, buffer, &len, &pos)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (size_t)0, len); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len); } /* @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_dointvec_read_happy_single_positive(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, KUNIT_PROC_READ, user_buffer, &len, &pos)); - KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, (size_t)3, len); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 3, len); buffer[len] = '\0'; /* And we read 13 back out. */ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, "13\n", buffer); @@ -233,9 +233,9 @@ static void sysctl_test_dointvec_read_happy_single_negative(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, KUNIT_PROC_READ, user_buffer, &len, &pos)); - KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, (size_t)4, len); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 4, len); buffer[len] = '\0'; - KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, "-16\n", (char *)buffer); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, "-16\n", buffer); } /* @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_dointvec_write_happy_single_positive(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, KUNIT_PROC_WRITE, user_buffer, &len, &pos)); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(input) - 1, len); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(input) - 1, (size_t)pos); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(input) - 1, pos); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 9, *((int *)table.data)); } @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_dointvec_write_happy_single_negative(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, KUNIT_PROC_WRITE, user_buffer, &len, &pos)); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(input) - 1, len); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(input) - 1, (size_t)pos); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(input) - 1, pos); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -9, *((int *)table.data)); } |