exec: Transform exec_update_mutex into a rw_semaphore

Recently syzbot reported[0] that there is a deadlock amongst the users
of exec_update_mutex.  The problematic lock ordering found by lockdep
was:

   perf_event_open  (exec_update_mutex -> ovl_i_mutex)
   chown            (ovl_i_mutex       -> sb_writes)
   sendfile         (sb_writes         -> p->lock)
     by reading from a proc file and writing to overlayfs
   proc_pid_syscall (p->lock           -> exec_update_mutex)

While looking at possible solutions it occured to me that all of the
users and possible users involved only wanted to state of the given
process to remain the same.  They are all readers.  The only writer is
exec.

There is no reason for readers to block on each other.  So fix
this deadlock by transforming exec_update_mutex into a rw_semaphore
named exec_update_lock that only exec takes for writing.

Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Christopher Yeoh <cyeoh@au1.ibm.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Fixes: eea9673250db ("exec: Add exec_update_mutex to replace cred_guard_mutex")
[0] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/00000000000063640c05ade8e3de@google.com
Reported-by: syzbot+db9cdf3dd1f64252c6ef@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87ft4mbqen.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index dc568ca295bd..55b2330b556c 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -1325,7 +1325,7 @@ static void put_ctx(struct perf_event_context *ctx)
  * function.
  *
  * Lock order:
- *    exec_update_mutex
+ *    exec_update_lock
  *	task_struct::perf_event_mutex
  *	  perf_event_context::mutex
  *	    perf_event::child_mutex;
@@ -11721,14 +11721,14 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
 	}
 
 	if (task) {
-		err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&task->signal->exec_update_mutex);
+		err = down_read_interruptible(&task->signal->exec_update_lock);
 		if (err)
 			goto err_task;
 
 		/*
 		 * Preserve ptrace permission check for backwards compatibility.
 		 *
-		 * We must hold exec_update_mutex across this and any potential
+		 * We must hold exec_update_lock across this and any potential
 		 * perf_install_in_context() call for this new event to
 		 * serialize against exec() altering our credentials (and the
 		 * perf_event_exit_task() that could imply).
@@ -12017,7 +12017,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
 	mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex);
 
 	if (task) {
-		mutex_unlock(&task->signal->exec_update_mutex);
+		up_read(&task->signal->exec_update_lock);
 		put_task_struct(task);
 	}
 
@@ -12053,7 +12053,7 @@ err_alloc:
 		free_event(event);
 err_cred:
 	if (task)
-		mutex_unlock(&task->signal->exec_update_mutex);
+		up_read(&task->signal->exec_update_lock);
 err_task:
 	if (task)
 		put_task_struct(task);
@@ -12358,7 +12358,7 @@ static void perf_event_exit_task_context(struct task_struct *child, int ctxn)
 /*
  * When a child task exits, feed back event values to parent events.
  *
- * Can be called with exec_update_mutex held when called from
+ * Can be called with exec_update_lock held when called from
  * setup_new_exec().
  */
 void perf_event_exit_task(struct task_struct *child)