mm, mempolicy: fix printing stack contents in numa_maps

When reading /proc/pid/numa_maps, it's possible to return the contents of
the stack where the mempolicy string should be printed if the policy gets
freed from beneath us.

This happens because mpol_to_str() may return an error the
stack-allocated buffer is then printed without ever being stored.

There are two possible error conditions in mpol_to_str():

 - if the buffer allocated is insufficient for the string to be stored,
   and

 - if the mempolicy has an invalid mode.

The first error condition is not triggered in any of the callers to
mpol_to_str(): at least 50 bytes is always allocated on the stack and this
is sufficient for the string to be written.  A future patch should convert
this into BUILD_BUG_ON() since we know the maximum strlen possible, but
that's not -rc material.

The second error condition is possible if a race occurs in dropping a
reference to a task's mempolicy causing it to be freed during the read().
The slab poison value is then used for the mode and mpol_to_str() returns
-EINVAL.

This race is only possible because get_vma_policy() believes that
mm->mmap_sem protects task->mempolicy, which isn't true.  The exit path
does not hold mm->mmap_sem when dropping the reference or setting
task->mempolicy to NULL: it uses task_lock(task) instead.

Thus, it's required for the caller of a task mempolicy to hold
task_lock(task) while grabbing the mempolicy and reading it.  Callers with
a vma policy store their mempolicy earlier and can simply increment the
reference count so it's guaranteed not to be freed.

Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index 79827ce03e3b..14df8806ff29 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -1158,6 +1158,7 @@ static int show_numa_map(struct seq_file *m, void *v, int is_pid)
 	struct vm_area_struct *vma = v;
 	struct numa_maps *md = &numa_priv->md;
 	struct file *file = vma->vm_file;
+	struct task_struct *task = proc_priv->task;
 	struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
 	struct mm_walk walk = {};
 	struct mempolicy *pol;
@@ -1177,9 +1178,11 @@ static int show_numa_map(struct seq_file *m, void *v, int is_pid)
 	walk.private = md;
 	walk.mm = mm;
 
-	pol = get_vma_policy(proc_priv->task, vma, vma->vm_start);
+	task_lock(task);
+	pol = get_vma_policy(task, vma, vma->vm_start);
 	mpol_to_str(buffer, sizeof(buffer), pol, 0);
 	mpol_cond_put(pol);
+	task_unlock(task);
 
 	seq_printf(m, "%08lx %s", vma->vm_start, buffer);
 
@@ -1189,7 +1192,7 @@ static int show_numa_map(struct seq_file *m, void *v, int is_pid)
 	} else if (vma->vm_start <= mm->brk && vma->vm_end >= mm->start_brk) {
 		seq_printf(m, " heap");
 	} else {
-		pid_t tid = vm_is_stack(proc_priv->task, vma, is_pid);
+		pid_t tid = vm_is_stack(task, vma, is_pid);
 		if (tid != 0) {
 			/*
 			 * Thread stack in /proc/PID/task/TID/maps or