summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>2016-07-14 23:02:47 -0400
committerTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>2016-07-14 23:02:47 -0400
commit554a5ccc4e4a20c5f3ec859de0842db4b4b9c77e (patch)
treeeabafe736e7e667f02a1e7b6f8a0e1721099beb7 /fs/ext4/mballoc.c
parent598c7d7abc832e35677b851f6afb93141c09993b (diff)
downloadlinux-554a5ccc4e4a20c5f3ec859de0842db4b4b9c77e.tar.gz
ext4: fix reference counting bug on block allocation error
If we hit this error when mounted with errors=continue or
errors=remount-ro:

    EXT4-fs error (device loop0): ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used:2940: comm ext4.exe: Allocating blocks 5090-6081 which overlap fs metadata

then ext4_mb_new_blocks() will call ext4_mb_release_context() and try to
continue. However, ext4_mb_release_context() is the wrong thing to call
here since we are still actually using the allocation context.

Instead, just error out. We could retry the allocation, but there is a
possibility of getting stuck in an infinite loop instead, so this seems
safer.

[ Fixed up so we don't return EAGAIN to userspace. --tytso ]

Fixes: 8556e8f3b6 ("ext4: Don't allow new groups to be added during block allocation")
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/ext4/mballoc.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/ext4/mballoc.c17
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 77249e1f5c3a..11562161e24a 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -2943,7 +2943,7 @@ ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 		ext4_error(sb, "Allocating blocks %llu-%llu which overlap "
 			   "fs metadata", block, block+len);
 		/* File system mounted not to panic on error
-		 * Fix the bitmap and repeat the block allocation
+		 * Fix the bitmap and return EFSCORRUPTED
 		 * We leak some of the blocks here.
 		 */
 		ext4_lock_group(sb, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group);
@@ -2952,7 +2952,7 @@ ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 		ext4_unlock_group(sb, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group);
 		err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, NULL, bitmap_bh);
 		if (!err)
-			err = -EAGAIN;
+			err = -EFSCORRUPTED;
 		goto out_err;
 	}
 
@@ -4517,18 +4517,7 @@ repeat:
 	}
 	if (likely(ac->ac_status == AC_STATUS_FOUND)) {
 		*errp = ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(ac, handle, reserv_clstrs);
-		if (*errp == -EAGAIN) {
-			/*
-			 * drop the reference that we took
-			 * in ext4_mb_use_best_found
-			 */
-			ext4_mb_release_context(ac);
-			ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group = 0;
-			ac->ac_b_ex.fe_start = 0;
-			ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len = 0;
-			ac->ac_status = AC_STATUS_CONTINUE;
-			goto repeat;
-		} else if (*errp) {
+		if (*errp) {
 			ext4_discard_allocated_blocks(ac);
 			goto errout;
 		} else {