dlm: fix slow rsb search in dir recovery

The function used to find an rsb during directory
recovery was searching the single linear list of
rsb's.  This wasted a lot of time compared to
using the standard hash table to find the rsb.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.c b/fs/dlm/lock.c
index d47183043c59..fa5c07d51dcc 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/lock.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/lock.c
@@ -411,8 +411,8 @@ static int rsb_cmp(struct dlm_rsb *r, const char *name, int nlen)
 	return memcmp(r->res_name, maxname, DLM_RESNAME_MAXLEN);
 }
 
-static int search_rsb_tree(struct rb_root *tree, char *name, int len,
-			   unsigned int flags, struct dlm_rsb **r_ret)
+int dlm_search_rsb_tree(struct rb_root *tree, char *name, int len,
+			unsigned int flags, struct dlm_rsb **r_ret)
 {
 	struct rb_node *node = tree->rb_node;
 	struct dlm_rsb *r;
@@ -474,12 +474,12 @@ static int _search_rsb(struct dlm_ls *ls, char *name, int len, int b,
 	struct dlm_rsb *r;
 	int error;
 
-	error = search_rsb_tree(&ls->ls_rsbtbl[b].keep, name, len, flags, &r);
+	error = dlm_search_rsb_tree(&ls->ls_rsbtbl[b].keep, name, len, flags, &r);
 	if (!error) {
 		kref_get(&r->res_ref);
 		goto out;
 	}
-	error = search_rsb_tree(&ls->ls_rsbtbl[b].toss, name, len, flags, &r);
+	error = dlm_search_rsb_tree(&ls->ls_rsbtbl[b].toss, name, len, flags, &r);
 	if (error)
 		goto out;