afs: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Notice that in many cases I placed a /* Fall through */ comment
at the bottom of the case, which what GCC is expecting to find.

In other cases I had to tweak a bit the format of the comments.

This patch suppresses ALL missing-break-in-switch false positives
in fs/afs

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115042 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115043 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115045 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1357430 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115047 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115050 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115051 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1467806 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1467807 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1467811 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115041 ("Missing break in switch")
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/fs/afs/file.c b/fs/afs/file.c
index 323ae9912203..e8d6619890a9 100644
--- a/fs/afs/file.c
+++ b/fs/afs/file.c
@@ -300,6 +300,8 @@ int afs_page_filler(void *data, struct page *page)
 		/* page will not be cached */
 	case -ENOBUFS:
 		_debug("cache said ENOBUFS");
+
+		/* fall through */
 	default:
 	go_on:
 		req = kzalloc(sizeof(struct afs_read) + sizeof(struct page *),