diff options
| author | Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> | 2015-02-27 15:51:51 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2015-02-28 09:57:51 -0800 |
| commit | 39ea34cc07fb1ca8059239290967e006bbdacceb (patch) | |
| tree | 458d40c14e47201c1e9c6e42a54d68f7083a5874 /drivers/rtc | |
| parent | 682354d4e0bf9a28f11b52ef9be7fb38b901bd5c (diff) | |
| download | linux-39ea34cc07fb1ca8059239290967e006bbdacceb.tar.gz | |
rtc: ds1685: remove superfluous checks for out-of-range u8 values
drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1685.c: In function `ds1685_rtc_read_alarm': drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1685.c:402: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1685.c:409: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1685.c:416: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1685.c: In function `ds1685_rtc_set_alarm': drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1685.c:475: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1685.c:478: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1685.c:481: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type u8 cannot contain a value larger than 0xff, hence drop the checks. Wrapping the checks in unlikely() indicated some sense of humor, though ;-) Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Acked-by: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org> Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/rtc')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1685.c | 12 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1685.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1685.c index 5dc1ef9d0008..29b461c76072 100644 --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1685.c +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1685.c @@ -399,21 +399,21 @@ ds1685_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm) * of this RTC chip. We check for it anyways in case support is * added in the future. */ - if (unlikely((seconds >= 0xc0) && (seconds <= 0xff))) + if (unlikely(seconds >= 0xc0)) alrm->time.tm_sec = -1; else alrm->time.tm_sec = ds1685_rtc_bcd2bin(rtc, seconds, RTC_SECS_BCD_MASK, RTC_SECS_BIN_MASK); - if (unlikely((minutes >= 0xc0) && (minutes <= 0xff))) + if (unlikely(minutes >= 0xc0)) alrm->time.tm_min = -1; else alrm->time.tm_min = ds1685_rtc_bcd2bin(rtc, minutes, RTC_MINS_BCD_MASK, RTC_MINS_BIN_MASK); - if (unlikely((hours >= 0xc0) && (hours <= 0xff))) + if (unlikely(hours >= 0xc0)) alrm->time.tm_hour = -1; else alrm->time.tm_hour = ds1685_rtc_bcd2bin(rtc, hours, @@ -472,13 +472,13 @@ ds1685_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm) * field, and we only support four fields. We put the support * here anyways for the future. */ - if (unlikely((seconds >= 0xc0) && (seconds <= 0xff))) + if (unlikely(seconds >= 0xc0)) seconds = 0xff; - if (unlikely((minutes >= 0xc0) && (minutes <= 0xff))) + if (unlikely(minutes >= 0xc0)) minutes = 0xff; - if (unlikely((hours >= 0xc0) && (hours <= 0xff))) + if (unlikely(hours >= 0xc0)) hours = 0xff; alrm->time.tm_mon = -1; |