diff options
| author | Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com> | 2012-07-05 23:06:57 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> | 2012-07-15 21:49:53 +0100 |
| commit | 8fa25eda86b1a149fd19b5ce80d8cf7b6c8fb566 (patch) | |
| tree | 6d55a3d26f23d85ca2a4da11d66a2f86db77b53b /drivers/regulator | |
| parent | 8a8e3d5915b3b40a64a5e7dc5aeb208594917a15 (diff) | |
| download | linux-8fa25eda86b1a149fd19b5ce80d8cf7b6c8fb566.tar.gz | |
regulator: max8997: Properly handle gpio_request failure
Convert to devm_gpio_request to save a few error handling code. This patch properly handle the gpio_request failure with -EBUSY, we should return error rather than ommit the gpio_request failure with -EBUSY. I think one of the reason we got -EBUSY is because current code does not free gpios in max8997_pmic_remove(). So it got -EBUSY when reload the module. Yest another reason is in current code if gpio_request() returns -EBUSY, the rest of the code still calls gpio_direction_output to config buck125_gpios and set gpio value in max8997_set_gpio(). This looks wrong to me. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/regulator')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/regulator/max8997.c | 40 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 31 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/max8997.c b/drivers/regulator/max8997.c index 704cd49ef375..e39a0c7260dc 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/max8997.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/max8997.c @@ -1025,7 +1025,6 @@ static __devinit int max8997_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) */ if (pdata->buck1_gpiodvs || pdata->buck2_gpiodvs || pdata->buck5_gpiodvs) { - bool gpio1set = false, gpio2set = false; if (!gpio_is_valid(pdata->buck125_gpios[0]) || !gpio_is_valid(pdata->buck125_gpios[1]) || @@ -1035,40 +1034,20 @@ static __devinit int max8997_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) goto err_out; } - ret = gpio_request(pdata->buck125_gpios[0], - "MAX8997 SET1"); - if (ret == -EBUSY) - dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Duplicated gpio request" - " on SET1\n"); - else if (ret) + ret = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, pdata->buck125_gpios[0], + "MAX8997 SET1"); + if (ret) goto err_out; - else - gpio1set = true; - - ret = gpio_request(pdata->buck125_gpios[1], - "MAX8997 SET2"); - if (ret == -EBUSY) - dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Duplicated gpio request" - " on SET2\n"); - else if (ret) { - if (gpio1set) - gpio_free(pdata->buck125_gpios[0]); + + ret = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, pdata->buck125_gpios[1], + "MAX8997 SET2"); + if (ret) goto err_out; - } else - gpio2set = true; - ret = gpio_request(pdata->buck125_gpios[2], + ret = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, pdata->buck125_gpios[2], "MAX8997 SET3"); - if (ret == -EBUSY) - dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Duplicated gpio request" - " on SET3\n"); - else if (ret) { - if (gpio1set) - gpio_free(pdata->buck125_gpios[0]); - if (gpio2set) - gpio_free(pdata->buck125_gpios[1]); + if (ret) goto err_out; - } gpio_direction_output(pdata->buck125_gpios[0], (max8997->buck125_gpioindex >> 2) @@ -1079,7 +1058,6 @@ static __devinit int max8997_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) gpio_direction_output(pdata->buck125_gpios[2], (max8997->buck125_gpioindex >> 0) & 0x1); /* SET3 */ - ret = 0; } /* DVS-GPIO disabled */ |