summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/drivers/mux/core.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>2020-03-19 18:05:25 -0500
committerKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>2020-03-23 19:18:27 +0200
commit0562ebcf054afae5100782ba082355be0495b04d (patch)
treee1eb547b5bd6a61c12f6e073f3643ab350ae3a51 /drivers/mux/core.c
parentb0c40588161dafdafdbac537b4441be02c15aff2 (diff)
downloadlinux-0562ebcf054afae5100782ba082355be0495b04d.tar.gz
ray_cs: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200319230525.GA14835@embeddedor.com
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/mux/core.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions