diff options
| author | Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi> | 2011-03-30 22:57:33 -0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi> | 2011-03-31 11:26:23 -0300 |
| commit | 25985edcedea6396277003854657b5f3cb31a628 (patch) | |
| tree | f026e810210a2ee7290caeb737c23cb6472b7c38 /drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c | |
| parent | 6aba74f2791287ec407e0f92487a725a25908067 (diff) | |
| download | linux-25985edcedea6396277003854657b5f3cb31a628.tar.gz | |
Fix common misspellings
Fixes generated by 'codespell' and manually reviewed. Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c b/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c index f9a5331e9445..0b49266840b9 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ static void fixup_old_sst_eraseregion(struct mtd_info *mtd) struct cfi_private *cfi = map->fldrv_priv; /* - * These flashes report two seperate eraseblock regions based on the + * These flashes report two separate eraseblock regions based on the * sector_erase-size and block_erase-size, although they both operate on the * same memory. This is not allowed according to CFI, so we just pick the * sector_erase-size. @@ -611,8 +611,8 @@ static struct mtd_info *cfi_amdstd_setup(struct mtd_info *mtd) * * Note that anything more complicated than checking if no bits are toggling * (including checking DQ5 for an error status) is tricky to get working - * correctly and is therefore not done (particulary with interleaved chips - * as each chip must be checked independantly of the others). + * correctly and is therefore not done (particularly with interleaved chips + * as each chip must be checked independently of the others). */ static int __xipram chip_ready(struct map_info *map, unsigned long addr) { @@ -635,8 +635,8 @@ static int __xipram chip_ready(struct map_info *map, unsigned long addr) * * Note that anything more complicated than checking if no bits are toggling * (including checking DQ5 for an error status) is tricky to get working - * correctly and is therefore not done (particulary with interleaved chips - * as each chip must be checked independantly of the others). + * correctly and is therefore not done (particularly with interleaved chips + * as each chip must be checked independently of the others). * */ static int __xipram chip_good(struct map_info *map, unsigned long addr, map_word expected) |